In my earlier posts, I shared my personal dispute with United Utilities, exposed the overseas ownership of UK water companies, and explored whether renationalisation could be the answer. But there’s another crucial piece of the puzzle: who is supposed to be holding these companies to account? And more importantly, are they doing their job?

The Regulatory Landscape

On paper, customers should be well-protected. The water industry in England and Wales is overseen by several bodies:

• Ofwat – the economic regulator, responsible for making sure companies provide reliable service at a fair price.
• The Environment Agency – monitors environmental standards, including river and coastal water quality.
• The Drinking Water Inspectorate – ensures water quality and safety.
• The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) – investigates misleading claims in advertising, such as slogans about saving water.
• Trading Standards – protects consumers from unfair practices, including false or misleading information.
• The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) – can investigate monopolistic structures and anti-competitive behaviour.
  

Where It’s Going Wrong

Despite all these regulators, customers still face:

• Rising bills – above inflation in many regions.
• Persistent leaks – wasting billions of litres every day.
• Sewage overflows – polluting rivers and beaches.
• Poor accountability – customers trapped in monopolies with no choice of provider.
• Misleading narratives – companies telling us to “save water” while wasting huge volumes themselves.

My own experience shows how these failings translate into real harm: weeks without reliable service, no private outdoor space, disrupted home working, and long-term stress. Yet when I sought accountability, no regulator stepped in to defend me as a customer.

The Accountability Gap

The truth is that regulators often focus on long-term performance metrics and company finances rather than the day-to-day struggles of customers. Ofwat issues fines and targets, but these are absorbed as “business costs” by multi-billion-pound corporations. The ASA or Trading Standards could challenge misleading claims, but rarely do so in the utilities sector. And while the CMA exists to tackle monopolies, water has been a monopoly since privatisation — with no real alternatives for consumers.

This creates a huge accountability gap: companies are effectively allowed to police themselves, safe in the knowledge that customers cannot leave.

Why It Matters

Regulation is supposed to balance the interests of companies and consumers. But when customers are left without water, facing damage to property and well-being, while companies continue paying hundreds of millions to investors, the system is broken.

In my case, the absence of effective intervention has left me seeking my own resolution — and it raises a question for everyone: if regulators aren’t protecting us, who will?

Where This Is Leading

In the next post, I’ll dig deeper into the insurance angle. Water companies are increasingly shifting costs onto household insurers when underground pipes fail. But what happens when this becomes the norm, and insurers — not water companies — are left to pick up the bill?

---

💧 Takeaway: The UK’s water regulators exist on paper to protect consumers and the environment. In practice, they are failing to stop poor service, rising bills, and misleading claims. Until regulators close the accountability gap, customers like me will continue to fall through the cracks.